Since I am now taking a class called the
Academia de Obreros from my church, I decided to read ahead to one of the last lessons in our little booklet that they give us. It was talking about baptism and trying to say that one of the evidences of being baptised by the Holy Spirit is that you will speak in tongues and it gave reference to the Gospel of Mark, which states:
Mark 16:17-18
These signs will accompany those who believe: In my name they will drive out demons; they will speak in new languages; they will pick up snakes with their hands, and whatever poison they drink will not harm them; they will place their hands on the sick and they will be well.”
However, I noticed that the text for this chunk in my bible is a smaller font. So I read the notes and it has a lot of evidence why Mark 16:9-20 was
not actually written by Mark and therefore was not divinely inspired!
Upon a little research, I also found a similar case is found with John 7:53-8:11, which contains the famous line "Whoever among you is guiltless may be the first to throw a stone at her." or "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone".
The source that listed both of these also said that these are the only two known cases in the entire bible that the scripture MAY not be divinely inspired. My bible has the following footnote after these two passages: "[the passage] most likely was not part of the original text of the Gospel of John. In spite of this, the passage has an important role in the history of the transmission of the text, so it has been included in the translation". Obviously it says "Gospel of Mark" respectively.
I have concluded that to be on the safe side, I will not base any weight on these passages. Since the "gifts of the spirit" and how they are abused has been really bothering me lately, I am going to completely disregard Mark 16:9-20, however John 7:53-8:11 has a really kewl story, so I will consider it as a reference of something Jesus
probably did during his life. However it also raises a question.
IF John 7:53-8:11 is not scriptural, then the statement "I do not condemn you either" was not inspired by God and therefore has the possibility of not being true. Which leads me to think ...does God condemn sinners? what about those who do not repent? This woman in the story
clearly did
not repent for her sin. Also, the statement "Go, and from now on do not sin anymore" also seems to me like it
may not be something Jesus would say. We are all sinners. We know it, and God knows it even more than we do. No matter how saintly a person may think of themself, this does not get them into Heaven. You are saved by the Grace of God alone, not by your actions. So anyway, God, knowing
full well that we all fall short of His glory, to make a statement like "and from now on do not sin anymore" seems a bit bold to me. Of course, God commands us all not to sin. Ever. But, I dunno, I could see why this statement doesn't really match the things that Jesus says. Maybe if he had told her to turn away from her adulterous ways, that would make more sense because then the people would have no reason to stone her to death.
With this passage included, the following passage (John 8:12) seems a bit out of place. After "Jesus was alone with the woman" (John 8:9) all of a sudden, he is preaching to the Pharisees. It doesn't say that he left and went somewhere else. It just starts saying how he just started preaching to the people. However, this would fit
very well if it was a continuation after John 7:52. In John 7:52 they are saying how no prophet is from Galilee (referring to Jesus), and in the next one Jesus speaks out saying that he is the "light of the world", sort of negating the fact that no prophet comes from Galilee. What is the light of the world? It is something that will lead the people. This is what Jesus has done. He leads his people to salvation through his death and resurrection.